There has been a considerable debate whatever ICANN will enforce the contractual agreement between registrars and registries to display personal data in the WHOIS.
Publication of personal data in the WHOIS is usually in conflict with many data protection laws around the world.
The EU GDPR and its substantial non-compliance fines seem to sway the discussion into a direction where ICANN needs to come up with solutions. And they did: ICANN published several models that propose to limit the publication of personal data in the WHOIS. The next step is that the ICANN community analyzes these models.
The models created by the ICANN Organisation can be viewed through the link below.
All the models published by the ICANN community are posted here.
The end of WHOIS?
The models proposed by the ICANN organization have limited personal info published in the WHOIS the two other models no longer publish personal data in the WHOIS.
The ECO model also has in common that there is no personal data published in the WHOIS.
So ultimately I think we are heading to a solution where registries and registrars no longer will publish person data in the WHOIS.
All models continue their support for data transfer to registries. In my opinion, this does not meet the EU GDPR data minimization principle, which I will explain in a future blog post.
Most beautiful model?
All models are not perfect, and to be used as a solution the following are of key importance.
- Implementation time frame.
In my opinion, the ECO model fits those requirements.
In addition to this, the ECO model has the largest industry support, which is key critical for mass adoption.
The end of privacy protection services?
Should you still use the Realtime Register privacy protect service even when there will be no personal data published in the WHOIS in May 2018?
The short answer is, yes.
All proposed models might tackle the WHOIS issue; it does not address the issue of possible data breaches, increased legal requirements for you as a reseller, and other areas of GDPR noncompliance. Our privacy service does that, though perhaps we should rename our privacy service to Data Protection Compliance Services (DPCS).
Keep in mind the solutions proposed are interim solutions, I would urge the ICANN community to band together and start working on real lasting solutions, rather than attacking interim solutions.
Realtime Register is a supporter of the ECO model.